Medtech Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

From Suppliers To Sloppiness, Experts Offer 5 Theories Why Aging Devices Are Recalled Most

This article was originally published in The Silver Sheet

Executive Summary

A CDRH report recently showed that a majority of recalled devices are older, yet the center has provided little insight into how it came to its conclusion. FDA’s relative silence on the matter has left several industry insiders to deduce for themselves why aging product types struggle more with recalls than younger ones. One such expert believes a failure by manufacturers to understand their own products and evolving international standards play a role in the substantial number of older-device recalls. “I don’t think there’s any one thing you can say is causing this problem,” said Monica Wilkins, divisional VP of QA/RA for device-maker Abbott Labs. But in a time of increased global manufacturing and troubles keeping an eye on supply chains, it’s a safe bet that poor supplier control is a culprit.

You may also be interested in...



2014 Hot Spots: Top 4 Device Quality & Regulatory Topics

Big changes are afoot for inspections, and device stakeholders kept a sharp eye on those issues in 2014, according to readership data from "The Silver Sheet." From a CDRH/ORA plan to create a specialized unit of device-focused field investigators, to IMDRF's mostly untested internationally harmonized single-audit approach, readers (and podcast listeners) couldn't get enough news and tips about inspection activities. A recap of in-depth "Silver Sheet" coverage from the year, including updated expert commentary, follows.

2014 Hot Spots: Top 4 Device Quality & Regulatory Topics

Big changes are afoot for inspections, and device stakeholders kept a sharp eye on those issues in 2014, according to "Silver Sheet" readership data. From a CDRH/ORA plan to create a specialized unit of device-focused field investigators, to IMDRF's mostly untested internationally harmonized single-audit approach, readers (and podcast listeners) couldn't get enough news and tips about inspection activities. Further, FDA is "looking at whether information presented on FDA-483s can be organized in a way that better reflects what we consider to be highest priority quality system deviations that require the most significant attention,” CDRH compliance chief Steven Silverman said. Rounding out the top industry issues last year were device recalls, Unique Device Identification, warning letters and CAPA. A recap of in-depth "Silver Sheet" coverage from the year, including updated expert commentary, follows.

‘Paradoxical’ FDA Recalls Report Credits Industry Collaboration For Improved Quality, But Uncovers Troubling Data About Older Devices

Medical devices on the market for more than five years are recalled more often than younger ones, according to a recent FDA 10-year retrospective report on corrections and removals. “There is an intuitive appeal to the argument that devices that come to the market in an early point in their lifespan – say, the first year – are more likely to be subject to recalls, but that is simply not true,” CDRH Office of Compliance Director Steven Silverman says. Other notable report findings: troubles with components and software are the leading causes for most recalls; problems with AEDs, ventilators and infusion pumps have triggered an increase in high-risk class I recalls; and domestic manufacturers recall products at a much greater volume than those outside the United States.

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT036768

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel