Domestic, Foreign Manufacturers Achieve Virtual Quality-Related FDA Warning Letter Parity; Missive-Counting Methodologies Explained
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Quality-related warning letters sent to foreign device manufacturers are on the rise, FDA data shows: 62 domestic and 59 non-US firms received letters that included at least one violation of the Quality System Regulation. Also: FDA's yearly warning letter count has closely mirrored separate analyses by The Gray Sheet for more than a decade, yet over the past two years those counts have wildly diverged; we explain why.
You may also be interested in...
Warning Letter Nosedive: US FDA Writes Fewest Quality-Related Missives Since 2002; Agency Isn't Sure Why
Only 57 quality-related warning letters were issued to device manufacturers in 2016, a 14-year-low that has left US FDA scratching its head as to why so few were sent to firms. "Our analyst team talked to both managers and staff alike within the device center, within ORA, and we could not identify a single factor or event to attribute the drop to," FDA compliance office official Sean Boyd said in an interview. Also: US inspections are down 2%, while foreign audits are up 16%; the top three quality system violations are revealed by FDA; an update on the number of close-out letters sent to firms; and more.
The US agency is inundated with adverse events through its Medical Device Reporting system with more than 1.4 million sent to FDA in 2015. Yet several industry experts – including from Eli Lilly and Implant Direct (Danaher) – say the industry overall may be underreporting adverse events, while some firms are overreporting. Preliminary 2016 warning letter data compiled by Medtech Insight also pinpoint problems with MDRs and complaint handling. Meanwhile, quality officials debate what makes a good complaint handling system, and tell what FDA expects from manufacturers. Plus: check out Medtech Insight's new FDA Warning Letters Data Tracker.
While disappointing result will probably put an end to single-drug plans in ovarian cancer, the blockbuster anti-PD-1 immunotherapy remains in combination development for the indication.