Researchers Push FDA To Raise Standards For Metal-On-Metal Hips
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Flaws in the 510(k) process prevented FDA from noticing high metal-on-metal revision rates, researchers write in the New England Journal of Medicine. Their argument is based on a predicate “ancestry” analysis of DePuy’s recalled ASR hip system.
You may also be interested in...
A final order from FDA calls for manufacturers to submit PMAs or take their metal-on-metal hip devices off the market by May 18. The widely anticipated move is part of a broader response to elevated adverse event rates tied to the products.
FDA will host a public meeting July 13 to hear public input in advance of agency-industry negotiations to reauthorize the device user-fee program. Industry appears to feel better about the device-review program than it did during the prior user-fee program, but what the top issues will be during negotiations this time around remain to be seen. Ongoing reform efforts in Congress will impact the process.
The latest medical device regulatory and reimbursement news from Elsevier Business Intelligence’s “The Gray Sheet.” This month we cover FDA’s proposal to require PMAs for metal-on-metal hips, the launch of the Medical Device Innovation Consortium, CMS draft guidance on CED, and a recent analysis of the potential impact of the Affordable Care Act on device markets.