Medtech Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Laser Photonics

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

Registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and effective June 30 covers 2.6 mil. shares of common stock and 1 mil. Class A warrants being offered by selling shareholders and warrant holders. Although no proceeds from the sale will go to the company, the firm could receive "up to" about $4.3 mil. if the warrants are exercised "and all other outstanding options and warrants for which the underlying shares of common stock have been registered are exercised by the holders thereof." The warrants are listed under the symbol "LAZRW" on the NASDAQ exchange, entitle the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.25, and expire on Sept. 30, 1995....

You may also be interested in...



Merck & Co. Buys Out OncoImmune For Phase III COVID-19 Therapy

Deal snapshot: For $425m up front, the pharma obtains a Phase III recombination fusion protein that shows ability to improve hospitalized patients’ clinical status and reduce risk of death.

US COVID-19 Fraud: Latest Chloride Dioxide Products Linked To Claims Are Oral Rinses

Previous businesses FDA warned about COVID-19 claims for chlorine dioxide, a bleach solution, were marketing dietary supplements unlawfully. But Pro Breath MD's oral rinses available under the Dentist Select and OraCare brands are allowed and FDA isn’t asking the firm to discontinue distribution.

CMS Removes Some Stark Law ‘Bureaucratic Barriers’ In Final Rule

The Stark Law ban on self-referrals wouldn’t apply to some physician owners of advanced imaging facilities under a CMS final rule.

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

OM006550

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel