Patent Troll Lawsuits Rare In Device Industry, But May Increase, Attorneys Say
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Executive Summary
Patent attorneys suggest lawsuits from firms that buy up device patents purely to pursue litigation, which appears to have occurred recently with Medtronic’s kyphoplasty patents, may become a more common occurrence.
You may also be interested in...
A Post-IPR World Would Hold Patent Risks And Benefits For Medtech Companies
The inter partes review process, which provides a non-court strategy for invalidating patents, could conceivably come to an end depending on the Supreme Court's ruling in a case this spring. Device firms have been wary of the IPR process, which can weaken patent protections, but attorneys point out that it has also been a helpful tool in fighting against the growing threat of patent trolls in medtech. While bets are for upholding the system, legal experts say device companies could fall back to other processes previously used to stop patent trolls.
'Patent Troll' Turned Away By PTO In St. Jude Case
A patent review board found that a remote monitoring patent owned by a “non-practicing entity” was invalid due to obviousness. So-called "patent troll" cases had been relatively rare in the device arena, but there has been an increase in activity.
Patent-Reform Risks Remain For Device Firms In Lawmaker Efforts
With the legislative calendar winding down, the chances for passage of a patent bill in 2014 are waning, but lawmaker efforts targeting patent trolls should not be ignored because they hold serious potential risks for small device firms, an attorney says.