Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

No Summer Break? Legal, Enforcement Issues Tax Boston Scientific Counsel

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

Manhattan federal court will determine whether Boston Scientific is entitled to payment from Medinol for lost revenue associated with the Nir Flex stent

You may also be interested in...



Boston Scientific stent patent prevails

U.S. District Court for Delaware June 15 upholds a 2005 jury determination that Johnson & Johnson/Cordis' Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent infringes Boston Scientific's "Ding" patent for non-thrombogenic polymer technology. Cordis had asked the court to overturn the 2005 jury verdict and now says it will appeal the decision by District Court Judge Sue Robinson (1"The Gray Sheet" July 4, 2005, p. 5). The ruling is Robinson's third in six weeks on patent disputes between the sparring drug-eluting stent manufacturers. Prudential Equity Group senior medical device analyst Larry Biegelsen said in a June 15 research note that the continuing stent intellectual property battle between the two firms is "unlikely to have a substantial financial impact on either party"...

Boston Scientific stent patent prevails

U.S. District Court for Delaware June 15 upholds a 2005 jury determination that Johnson & Johnson/Cordis' Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent infringes Boston Scientific's "Ding" patent for non-thrombogenic polymer technology. Cordis had asked the court to overturn the 2005 jury verdict and now says it will appeal the decision by District Court Judge Sue Robinson (1"The Gray Sheet" July 4, 2005, p. 5). The ruling is Robinson's third in six weeks on patent disputes between the sparring drug-eluting stent manufacturers. Prudential Equity Group senior medical device analyst Larry Biegelsen said in a June 15 research note that the continuing stent intellectual property battle between the two firms is "unlikely to have a substantial financial impact on either party"...

Following Win Over Boston Scientific, Medinol Seeks Taxus Liberté Royalties

Medinol says it will pursue royalties from sales of Boston Scientific's Taxus Liberté drug-eluting stent following a Sept. 21 settlement of the firms' long-running patent infringement suit

Related Content

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT022341

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel