Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

IVD Study Designs Warrant Consultation With CDRH Staff – Draft Guidance

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

Discrepant resolution alone is an inadequate method for reliably estimating the value of a new diagnostic test in relation to an imperfect standard, an FDA draft guidance states

You may also be interested in...



FDA diagnostics guidance

Agency issues guidance on statistically appropriate practices for reporting qualitative results from studies to assess diagnostic tests. The March 13 document, "Statistical Guidance on Reporting Results from Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Tests," makes recommendations for submitting 510(k)s and PMAs for diagnostics. The guidance covers results from different types of studies and describes best practices for data collection and analysis. The guidance also outlines common inappropriate practices, focusing special attention on discrepant resolution and its associated problems. The agency received 11 comments on the 2003 draft version (1"The Gray Sheet" March 17, 2003, p. 11)...

FDA diagnostics guidance

Agency issues guidance on statistically appropriate practices for reporting qualitative results from studies to assess diagnostic tests. The March 13 document, "Statistical Guidance on Reporting Results from Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Tests," makes recommendations for submitting 510(k)s and PMAs for diagnostics. The guidance covers results from different types of studies and describes best practices for data collection and analysis. The guidance also outlines common inappropriate practices, focusing special attention on discrepant resolution and its associated problems. The agency received 11 comments on the 2003 draft version (1"The Gray Sheet" March 17, 2003, p. 11)...

GOLD STANDARD FOR NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION STUDIES SHOULD INCLUDE TESTS OTHER THAN CULTURE, PANEL MEMBERS SUGGEST; FDA POLICY UNDER DEVELOPMENT

Culture testing should be augmented by alternative diagnostic techniques in establishing a gold standard of comparison for nucleic acid-based tests for chlamydia and other diseases, FDA panel members said at a Feb. 11 meeting in Rockville, Maryland. FDA called the joint meeting of its Microbiology, Clinical Chemistry/ Toxicology, Hematology/Pathology and Immunology Panels to gain input on how to evaluate emerging in vitro diagnostic technologies.

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT018042

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel