Device Center Issues Staff Guidance Addressing 510(k) Intended Use
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Executive Summary
A new guidance on determining intended use for 510(k)s is one of the first post-MDUFMA guidance documents issued by the Center for Devices & Radiological Health
You may also be interested in...
Regulatory News In Brief
Hako-Med petition: Honolulu firm's April 23 petition requesting that low-voltage electrode lead wires in the vacuum hose of the VacuPulls/VasoPulse be exempted from the performance standard for electrode lead wires and patient cables (21 CFR 898) is denied by FDA. "In this instance, the public health derives no benefit from the continued use of non-compliant electrode lead wires that is not already provided by equivalent powered muscle stimulator and powered peripheral nerve stimulator devices that use compliant electrode wires," the agency writes in the Aug. 30 denial letter. "The continued marketing of unprotected electrode leads and patient cables, no matter how they are labeled, presents an unreasonable and substantial risk of illness or injury to individuals"...
IVD Office Reorganization, Consolidation Reflect HHS De-Layering Initiative
CDRH's new Office for In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety will merge six existing branches currently under the Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices into three distinct divisions by mid-November
Beauty Firms Using AI-Based Tools Could Be Subject To Health Privacy Laws In US States
Using AI-based programs to collect and store consumer information risks running afoul of new health privacy laws cropping up in US states. Lack of federal regulation or guidance on the issue is one of the biggest challenges for beauty firms deploying AI, according to Stacy Marcus, partner at Reed Smith LLP.