Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

MCAC Will Review E-stim As Adjunctive Therapy For Wound Healing

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

The Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee will review electrical stimulation for the treatment of chronic wounds as an adjunctive therapy, following a recommendation by the American Physical Therapy Association to the Health Care Financing Administration.

You may also be interested in...



Medtronic Incontinence Device Appears Set For Favorable MCAC Review

Medtronic's InterStim sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) device for urinary incontinence is apparently poised for the first favorable review by the Medicare Coverage Advisory Commission (MCAC), based on a technical assessment prepared by the Technology Evaluation Center (TEC) of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Association.

HCFA non-coverage decision of electrical stimulation for wound treatment enjoined by federal court.

HCFA NON-COVERAGE OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION FOR WOUND TREATMENT needs "a better explanation," Massachusetts federal court Judge George O'Toole declares in a Nov. 18 ruling that will require the Health Care Financing Administration to reimburse for the treatment. HCFA's decision "is so inadequately supported" by the evidence presented before the court that it justifies a new determination by the agency, according to Judge O'Toole.

California Court’s Inaction On TiO2 Prop 65 First Amendment Case Breeds New Lawsuits

The Personal Care Products Council seeks to stem the rising tide of titanium dioxide Proposition 65 lawsuits, requesting that a California court prohibit the state’s Attorney General and private enforcers from filing and/or prosecuting new suits against cosmetics companies failing to warn about potential TiO2 exposure.

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT013963

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel