Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA's Retroactive Use Of PMA Data Violates FDAMA, HIMA Petition Says

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

FDA violated the FDA Modernization Act by applying retroactively a provision of the law relating to use of data from approved premarket approval applications, the Health Industry Manufacturers Association maintains in an Aug. 9 citizen petition.

You may also be interested in...



"Six-Year Rule" On Access To PMA Data Applies To All PMAs Since 1990

FDA's decision to apply the FDA Modernization Act's "six-year rule" to premarket approval applications approved prior to enactment of the statute is consistent with a "least burdensome" approach, the agency maintains.

"Six-Year Rule" On Access To PMA Data Applies To All PMAs Since 1990

FDA's decision to apply the FDA Modernization Act's "six-year rule" to premarket approval applications approved prior to enactment of the statute is consistent with a "least burdensome" approach, the agency maintains.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripters

FDA proposed rule published Feb. 8 would reclassify the devices from Class III to Class II when intended to fragment kidney and ureteral calculi. A draft guidance released by the agency the same day would serve as a special control for the devices. According to the document, 510(k)s for lithotripters with mechanisms of action and shock wave characteristics similar to existing devices would require data from 20 patients at two sites. The stipulation is in line with a recommendation made by FDA's Gastroenterology and Urology Devices Panel in July ("The Gray Sheet" Aug. 3, 1998, p. 8)

Related Content

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT012169

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel