PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT DEFENSES COULD CENTER ON "MEETING COMPETITION," AHP ATTORNEY SAYS AT FAIRNESS HEARING FOR SETTLEMENT
Executive Summary
Pharmaceutical manufacturer defendants in pending Robinson-Patman Act litigation will likely claim that their discounts are legal moves to meet competition, American Home Products attorney Kenneth Logan (Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett) indicated during a June 11 fairness hearing on the proposed amended settlement in pharmacy's Sherman Act lawsuit.
You may also be interested in...
Part D Discount Liability Coming Into Focus: CMS Releases Drug Cost Data
Newly released Medicare Part D data sheds light on the sales hit that branded pharmaceutical manufacturers will face when the coverage gap discount program gets under way in 2011
FDA Skin Infections Guidance Spurs Debate On Endpoint Relevance
FDA appears headed for a showdown with clinicians and the pharmaceutical industry over the proposed new clinical trial endpoints for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, the guidance's approach for justifying a non-inferiority margin and proposed changes in the types of patients that should be enrolled in trials
Shire Hopes To Sow Future Deals With $50M Venture Fund
Specialty drug maker Shire has quietly begun scouting deals with a brand-new $50 million venture fund, the latest of several in-house investment arms to launch with their parent company's pipelines, not profits, as the measure of their worth