Intuitive Wants To Vaporize Antitrust Suit: No Relevant Aftermarket Distinct From Da Vinci
Executive Summary
A group of health care providers’ class action against Intuitive Surgical alleges that the firm’s sales agreements are anticompetitive, requiring costly repairs and instrument replacements that might otherwise be purchased from independent companies. According to Intuitive, plaintiffs must demonstrate sufficient demand for da Vinci parts and services separate from da Vinci systems.
You may also be interested in...
Market Intel: Robotic Surgery Holds Great Promise, But Is Not Quite There Yet
In this final part of a three-part series on the “Future of Surgery” we highlight perspectives of a highly skilled orthopedic robotic surgeon on where we are today in robotic surgery and where we are going, introduce innovative surgical robotics companies, and discuss medtechs’ rising role in robotic surgery.
Intuitive Fights Da Vinci Surgical Robot Monopoly Claims
Intuitive Surgical is facing multiple antitrust suits that say the company took advantage of its dominant market position by demanding hospitals come to it for expensive repairs and replacements.
L’Oreal, Estee Lauder Virtual Try-On Tools Captured User Biometrics Without Consent – Plaintiff
Biometric litigation has been stacking up in state and federal courts, including suits targeting cosmetics companies for alleged consumer privacy violations associated with virtual try-on tools. L’Oreal and The Estee Lauder Companies are among the latest to be hit with proposed class actions in Illinois federal court.