Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

US FDA Asks Prostate Ablation Device-Sponsors For More Clinical Safety Data To Support Clearances

Executive Summary

Almost four years after the agency first authorized a prostate ablation device, regulators have proposed a number of requirements for clinical studies that sponsors would have to meet to comply with special controls needed for the devices to be cleared for marketing.

You may also be interested in...



Final Prostate Ablation Guidance Asks For More Safety Data

Manufacturers developing devices to remove tissue in the prostate should provide the US FDA with follow-up information on patients that include certain indirect data about the long-term safety outcomes of using their product, according to a final agency guidance.

HIFU Face-Off: US Competition Begins For Prostate High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound

With the 510(k) clearance of EDAP TMS' Ablatherm HIFU and the first US procedure performed with SonaCare Medical's recently cleared Sonablate system, a European rivalry in high-intensity focused ultrasound machines for prostate cancer has moved to the US. And EDAP's CEO argues it was positive for long-term adoption that his firm's system ultimately gained 510(k) clearance as a surgical tool rather than the originally sought PMA approval for a prostate cancer indication.

De Novo Cleared For Sonablate Device After Panel Rejects PMA

The ultrasound unit for the ablation of prostate tissue was cleared via the de novo process. Last year, an FDA advisory panel recommended against approving a PMA on the device due to what the experts said were insufficient clinical trial results.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT125293

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel