Medtech Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Labs, Test Makers Urge Congress To Pass Diagnostic Reforms

Executive Summary

More than 80 industry, laboratory, health-care provider and patient groups sent a letter to two congressional committees, urging them to advance a bill to modernize the current way FDA regulates diagnostic tests, including possibly a new regulated product category that combines laboratory developed tests and in vitro diagnostics.

You may also be interested in...



FDA Continues Push To Bring Lab-Developed Tests Into The Fold

In a Dec. 6 blog post, US FDA officials continued pressing for a new system of diagnostics regulation that puts laboratory-developed test services (LDTs) on the same footing as IVD test kits, all under a new framework where only about 10% of tests would require pre-market review.

3 Big Medtech Takeaways From US Midterms

The balance of power will be shifting in Washington, DC, following the Nov. 6 US midterm elections, but that probably will not mean major changes for medtech policies. Here are some key takeaways from the election for device and diagnostics companies.

Pre-Certs, Test Groups And More: US FDA Outlines Possible New Dx Paradigm

The agency has responded to a draft diagnostics reform bill in Congress with proposed reforms that diverge some ways from the proposed legislation, but stick with the underlying goal of completely remaking how lab tests, including test kits and lab-developed tests, are regulated. The agency has put forward a proposal to establish a pre-certification process for test developers, divide most tests into high- or low-risk categories (but exempt many from pre-market review) and remove the concept of substantial equivalence.

Related Content

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS017586

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel