Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

US Trade Rep Recommends Tariffs On China-Sourced Medtech, BioPharma Products

Executive Summary

In addition to taxing foreign-made steel imports from certain countries, the US Trade Representative's office will soon recommend tariffs against Chinese-made biopharma and advanced medtech products, and other products in US/China competitive industries.

You may also be interested in...



Industry Gives US Trade Rep 12 Reasons Why Tariffs on Chinese Medtech Imports Are A Bad Idea

The US Trade Representative office's decision in March to include devices, imaging machines and diagnostics on a list of Chinese imports destined for a 25% tariff has riled up the industry. A half-dozen medtech organizations protested the move in comments and testimony this week, supplying USTR with 12 reasons why the tariffs are a very bad idea.

AdvaMed To Plead With USTR To Spare Medtech In China Tariffs

In prepared remarks shared with Medtech Insight, AdvaMed plans to argue that tariffs imposed on medtech products made in China would disrupt an ongoing "action plan" the industry is pursuing to achieve reciprocal market access between the US and China for the industry.

Trump Administration Wants Tariffs On 49 China-Imported Medtech Products

Citing China's "unfair trade practices on the forced transfer of US technology and intellectual property," the White House on April 3 proposed a 25% tariff on 49 types of Chinese medical devices, including products from advanced imaging units to hearing aids. Industry advocacy group AdvaMed says some members are "surprised and disappointed" by the inclusion of devices on the list.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT122396

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel