Industry Urges FDA To Distinguish Between 510(k) Modification Factors
Executive Summary
Industry groups and companies said US FDA's August draft guidance is inappropriately intermixing two different standards for determining when a new 510(k) needs to be submitted for a device modification. Respondents to the draft guidance on 510(k) modifications are also looking for more clarity on FDA's expectations for companies to assess how cumulative changes to a device might trigger the need for a new submission. But overall, firms support the current draft more than the agency's abandoned 2011 attempt to revise its policy.
You may also be interested in...
510(k) Modifications Guidance Docs Finalized At Long Last
After years of controversy, US FDA finally succeeded in updating its 20-year-old guideline on when a new 510(k) is needed for device modifications. Split out as its own document is a guideline targeting the issue specifically for software modifications.
US FDA: 510(k)-Exempt Class II Devices Should Withdraw Applications
In line with the 21st Century Cures Act, US FDA has finalized a list of class II devices that will no longer need pre-market notification to get to market. Also, check out our updated Cures Act implementation table.
21st Century Cures Implementation: Device Provision Updates
Dozens of reforms impacting the medtech sector were signed into law Dec. 13, 2016, in the 21st Century Cures Act. Here's a breakdown of where things stand in the implementation of key provisions.