Jury backs Johnson & Johnson in stent patent row with Boston
This article was originally published in Clinica
Executive Summary
A district court jury in Delaware has agreed with Johnson & Johnson's Cordis unit that stents made by Boston Scientific infringe its patents. Analysts had seen the ruling as a foregone conclusion, given the outcomes of earlier litigation against Boston Scientific and Medtronic involving one of the patents, the '762 or Palmaz patent covering balloon expandable stents.
You may also be interested in...
At-Home Health Testing Demand Is High Post-Pandemic, But So Are Barriers To Development And Use
At the recent Precision Med-Tri Con conference, laboratory experts traded views on the expansion of at-home testing for disease diagnosis and personalized health insights. While strong consumer demand spells opportunity, there are significant concerns about the accuracy and reliability of home-testing platforms, misuse, accessibility, and lack of health literacy.
Simplified Clinical Trial Transparency Rules To Go Live In The EU In June
A new version of the EU Clinical Trials Information System’s public portal will integrate the functionalities of the streamlined transparency rules.
Top-Selling Drugs 2023: Pharma’s $60bn COVID-19 Cliff
Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty toppled after recording the highest ever annual sales for a pharmaceutical in 2022, while Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic climbed rapidly. But Merck & Co’s immuno-oncology blockbuster Keytruda was secure in the number one spot in 2023 as COVID-19 receded.