Industry scouting for best outcome for EU medical technology companies facing dual compliance task
This article was originally published in Clinica
Executive Summary
Device companies operating in the EU that are likely to be affected by the overlap in essential requirements under the revised medical devices and active implantables directives (93/42 and 90/385) and the machinery Directive 2006/42 (see Clinica No 1263, p 1) will probably not be able to rely on last-minute help from the EU Council.
You may also be interested in...
California Court’s Inaction On TiO2 Prop 65 First Amendment Case Breeds New Lawsuits
The Personal Care Products Council seeks to stem the rising tide of titanium dioxide Proposition 65 lawsuits, requesting that a California court prohibit the state’s Attorney General and private enforcers from filing and/or prosecuting new suits against cosmetics companies failing to warn about potential TiO2 exposure.
Kenvue Breaks Ground On New Headquarters, Appoints Chief Corporate Affairs Officer
Firm hosts groundbreaking for 290,000 square-foot global headquarters it’s having built in Summit, NJ, starting with 100,000 square-foot science and innovation and expected to open in 2025. It announced adding Russell Dyer as chief corporate affairs officer starting 13 March.
Xaira Launches With $1bn-Plus And End-To-End AI Strategy
ARCH and Foresite incubated the company and recruited Genentech R&D veteran Marc Tessier-Lavigne to keep data generation, machine learning research and drug development under one roof.