Early PCI better than conservative treatment for heart attack patients in remote areas
This article was originally published in Clinica
Executive Summary
When heart attacks strike individuals in rural areas, thrombolysis followed by immediate transfer for angiography is a better treatment strategy than thrombolysis followed by conservative, community-hospital follow-up. The 266-patient NORDISTEMI trial, presented at the ESC meeting, studied the effect of early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after fibrinolysis in heart attack patients resident in areas of Norway 100-400km from the nearest PCI centre. It took around 130 minutes to get the patients to these centres. A composite of death, recurrence of heart attack or stroke at 12 months was significantly reduced in the early invasive group compared to the conservative group, the trial showed.
You may also be interested in...
ITF Has A Fight On Its Hands In Duchenne
The group’s new muscular dystrophy pill seems unlikely to cut into Sarepta’s sales.
AbbVie Needs To Freshen Up
With half of its 2023 sales coming from aging blockbusters like Humira and Botox, AbbVie needs new blood.
AstraZeneca Pays $2bn To Keep Up With The Joneses
Bristol Myers Squibb and Lilly have recently done billion-dollar radiopharmaceuticals deals, and now the UK group wants a piece of the market. But can it make its Fusion fusion work?