Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Medtech Solutions For The "Other" Incontinence

This article was originally published in Start Up

Executive Summary

Fecal incontinence is a common, devastating condition that often goes untreated. Eyeing the potential multibillion-dollar opportunity, medtech start-ups are developing approaches that range from small and disposable to surgical and permanent.

You may also be interested in...



Endo Unit Shutdown Could Strand Incontinence Treatment Praised By FDA Panel

Endo International plans to shutter its Astora Women's Health business unit – formerly part of American Medical Systems – this month due to ongoing legal concerns tied to the company’s vaginal mesh products. What’s unclear is what this means for the company’s investigational fecal incontinence treatment, which received unanimous support from an FDA advisory panel just days before the shutdown was announced.

Neuromodulation Devices Stimulate Opportunities In Urology

Neuromodulation for urological indications, notably overactive bladder (OAB), has been dominated since the late 1990s by Medtronic’s sacral-nerve stimulation system InterStim, with the more recent addition of Cogentix Medical’s Urgent PC for tibial nerve stimulation. Yet only a fraction of OAB patients receive effective neuromodulation treatment, and several companies hope to lower barriers to this modality by developing alternative devices for urological indications.

Transoral GERD Devices: Riding Out The Road To Reimbursement

With health care becoming increasingly data driven, third-party payors are requiring a higher level of evidence before making a positive coverage determination for a new technology or procedure. This has made the road to reimbursement much longer and tougher for device companies in general, and manufacturers of transoral devices for GERD are a prime example.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

Related Deals

Latest News
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT038054

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel