A Tech Transfer Sandbox for Device Companies
This article was originally published in Start Up
Stanford University is looking to take medical devices out of the tech transfer backwater through the launch of the Medical Device Network, designed to stimulate product innovation.
You may also be interested in...
For 20 years, interventional cardiologists denied the need for embolic protection devices, considering embolic events to generally be the infrequent results of poor technique. Nevertheless, recent data has revealed embolization as a potentially serious and relatively common event during percutaneous coronary interventions. While embolic protection devices have been shown to dramatically reduce embolic complications, physician adoption is slow. Several companies are developing different approaches to protect against embolization, recognizing that better patient data alone isn't enough to convince interventionalists to employ these devices.
Data show Opdivo/Cabometyx combo bests Sutent for overall and progression-free survival and response endpoints in first-line RCC. Exelixis CEO says comparison to Sutent is standard control and allows better comparison to other combo regimens.