Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Manufacturers Struggle To Determine Unique Device Identification’s Impact

This article was originally published in The Silver Sheet

Executive Summary

Unique Device Identification (UDI) will touch many parts of a manufacturer’s quality system, including CAPA, complaint handling, design control, design history files and management control, among several other areas. “Your quality system is going to be affected in any area where you deal with a product identifier,” Philips Medical Systems’ Michael Hudon points out. Many firms have already formed UDI implementation teams as they await FDA’s final regulation on the topic.

You may also be interested in...



Document Control Hot Spots – What Manufacturers Can Do To Avoid Them

Document control violations, noted in nearly a quarter of FDA warning letters in 2013, typically occur when manufacturers don’t have procedures or fail to ensure that document changes are applied systemically, FDA says. “When we list document control as an observation on FDA-483 [inspection] forms and cite it in warning letters, usually it’s because the firms don’t have anything at all – no document control procedures – or their document control procedures are inadequate,” CDRH Lead Consumer Safety Officer Ernest Smith notes. Experts also advise firms to schedule periodic document reviews and have a centralized document control group. “Don’t assume that everyone knows about document control,” says Karen St. Onge, a QA official at NxStage Medical.

FDA Releases Proposed Rule On UDI System, Ushering in ‘Modern Post-Market Surveillance System’

A proposed FDA regulation for a Unique Device Identification System is critical to the future of post-market safety surveillance, the agency says. The UDI system aims to reduce medical errors, and provide an array of other benefits for supply chain management. Makers of high-risk class III products will have one year to place UDI codes on devices. The UDI mandate will extend to moderate-risk class II devices two years later and to some low-risk class I devices two years after that.

Speaking Of Medtech, Ep. 10: FDA’s TAP Pilot

In this FINAL EPISODE of Speaking Of Medtech: The US FDA got something it desperately wanted in its latest user-fee package with industry: a Total Product Lifecycle Advisory Program pilot, or TAP. The agency says TAP will allow for earlier and more frequent engagement with developers – but is it needed?

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT036650

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel