Cardiac Imaging and CER: The Search for Efficiency
Executive Summary
Regardless of the final shape of health care reform legislation, there is little doubt that the swirling debate around that issue has highlighted an unambiguous need to reduce health system costs, increase efficiency, and improve patient outcomes. This is particularly true for high-cost diagnostics in crucial areas like cardiac care. The focus on fast-rising care costs has ratcheted up the pressure to reduce the number and fine-tune the quality of cardiac imaging procedures. And perhaps nothing signifies change in this area more than the introduction of comparative effectiveness research into the equation in the search for standards of care.
You may also be interested in...
Imaging Market Could See Brighter Days Ahead
More than two years into a prolonged economic slump that depressed capital equipment sales and weakened stock prices, manufacturers of diagnostic imaging equipment appear to have reason to smile again as hospitals restart the process of acquiring new equipment to replace aging technology.
AHRQ, NIH Report To Congress On Comparative Effectiveness Spending Plans
Two Health and Human Services agencies will allocate about $250 million this year in comparative effectiveness research funds from the federal stimulus package; the remainder of the $1.1 billion comparative effectiveness money will be put to use in 2010