Supreme Court’s Drug Patent Ruling Could Expand Use Of Expert Testimony
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Executive Summary
High court rules Federal Circuit should have granted deference to district court’s decision on meaning of a patent claim for a multiple sclerosis drug.
You may also be interested in...
Teva’s Copaxone Patent Win Delivers Bigger Blow To Sandoz Than Mylan
Sandoz, which has first to file on the generic, may have the most to lose after federal judge finds that Mylan and Sandoz ANDAs for generic Copaxone infringe all the claims in Teva’s patents, the latest of which expires in September 2015. FDA now has more time to review the ANDAs without pressure.
Lack Of Industry Involvement In Scoping Process Exacerbates ‘Unworkable’ Timelines
Scientific advice could help companies make up for the lack of involvement in scoping, but slots are in short supply.
Cosmetic And Personal Care Trademark Review: 16 April
Personal care and cosmetic product trademark filings compiled from the Official Gazette of the US Patent and Trademark Office, Class 3.