Fewer Stents, Less Spending: Fractional Flow Reserve Cost Savings Validated
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Performing a percutaneous coronary intervention on a patient and providing one year of follow-up care costs, on average, $2,385 less if fractional flow reserve screening is used along with standard coronary angiography to help guide stent placement, researchers concluded in the Dec. 14 issue of the journal Circulation. What's more, outcomes are significantly better using FFR.
You may also be interested in...
Rights for Abbott to promote and distribute intravascular optical coherence tomography imaging and fractional flow reserve products from St. Jude Medical are added to an existing co-promotion pact between the firms.
The Senate Finance Committee signaled enhanced scrutiny into unnecessary use of stents and other implantable devices in a report released Dec. 6.
Test improves DES outcomes: Routine measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) - the ratio of maximal blood flow in a stenotic artery to normal maximal flow - with St. Jude's PressureWire Certus guidewire-mounted sensor improves outcomes of drug-eluting stent implants in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, according to results of the FAME trial published in the Jan. 15 New England Journal of Medicine. The 20-center trial randomized 1,005 patients with multivessel disease to undergo implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by angiography and FFR or drug-eluting stent implantation guided by angiography alone. The overall composite adverse event rates were 18.3% in the angiography-alone group and 13.2% in the FFR group. Adverse events included death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. The trial also showed that including FFR in the procedure saved money and only added one minute to the average procedure time (71 minutes versus 70 minutes). The average procedure cost was $6,007 in the angiography-alone group compared to $5,332 for the FFR group, partly because FFR measurement led to the implant of fewer stents. The FFR group received an average of 1.9 stents per patient compared to 2.7 for the angiography-alone group, even though patients in the FFR group had an average of 2.8 coronary lesions compared to 2.7 for the angiography-alone group. The study was sponsored by Medtronic, Friends of the Heart Foundation and St. Jude Medical/Radi Medical Systems