Firms Find FDA Less Efficient, Less Competent Than European Counterparts
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Inefficiencies in the FDA review process, such as high rates of staff turnover, are substantially increasing costs and time to market compared to Europe, according to a survey of small to mid-sized device manufacturers.
You may also be interested in...
Booz Allen: Too Soon To Say If FDA Process Reforms Are Working
FDA's device center has implemented all the recommendations Booz Allen Hamilton has made in the past several years to improve the review process, the consulting firm said in its latest independent assessment report. But it is still too early to conclude if the changes have led to significant improvements.
Hamburg: Neither U.S. Nor EU Device Regulation Has It Completely Right
During her final public appearance at the National Press Club, outgoing FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg defended her tenure and said she was leaving a stronger FDA than the one she inherited. Asked about the agency's device regulatory process, she said she didn't know if FDA or Europe had struck the right balance but said more work needs to be done.
Consistency Among CDRH Review Divisions Improves, But Industry Wants More
A new report from the California Healthcare Institute shows a positive convergence of performance among FDA’s device review divisions, but the biomedical industry group thinks more policy reforms that build on models from the best performing CDRH divisions and branches might be warranted.