Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Process For Appealing FDA Actions To Be Clarified, CDRH Ombudsman Says

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

FDA's device center is reworking procedures for resolving disputes between industry and FDA reviewers, and expanding the types of regulatory actions that can be appealed.

You may also be interested in...



Draft Appeals Guidance Does Not Address Industry’s Main Concerns, Says Device Attorney

FDA’s new draft guidance explains the various routes to appeal a CDRH decision, but doesn’t do much to reform the appeals process, according to one device attorney.

Regulatory News In Brief

CDRH ombudsman report: The number of external complaints, disputes and inquiries fielded by the FDA device center's ombudsman jumped 47% in 2009, from 170 to 250. 70% of the contacts came from industry and 17% originated with consumers, according to the 2009 CDRH ombudsman 1report, released last week. More than 50% of the contacts involved complaints. A number of the items fielded concerned 510(k)s (15%) and pre-market approval applications (9%). In addition, most centered on staff or issues within the Office of Device Evaluation (54% of contacts), Office of Compliance (17%) or Office of Management Operations (9%). Commonly raised issues related to CDRH policies and procedures, pre-market testing requirements (and whether FDA was truly requiring the "least burdensome" amount of data), miscommunication and a lack of timely action. The vast majority of items (92%) were addressed within the year. The ombudsman received only one request for review of a scientific dispute by the Medical Devices Dispute Resolution Panel; CDRH is attempting to resolve the matter by other means. After nearly a decade helping resolve problems between regulators and industry, CDRH Ombudsman Les Weinstein will leave the post April 9 to join FDA's newly created tobacco products center

Second EU MDR Notified Body Designated In France

Four years after the designation of the first notified body in France under the Medical Device Regulation, AFNOR Certification has been named too.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT029552

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel