Medtech Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By


FDA Works To Fill Panel Vacancies While Tightening Conflict Rules

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

FDA is working on an initiative to fill up to two-thirds of the current vacancies on its advisory committees, but it is not backing down from a strict conflict-of-interest policy that many see as contributing to the advisory panel vacancies

You may also be interested in...

Regulatory News In Brief

FDA issues documents on advisory committee financial conflicts and scientific integrity. More regulatory updates.

FDA Develops Scientific Integrity Guide For Staff

FDA plans to publicly issue its staff manual on scientific integrity in the near future.

Regulatory News In Brief

Conflict of interest comments: The American Association for Justice urges stricter requirements for advisory committee members with financial conflicts in June 21 comments on FDA's latest draft guidance regarding advisory committee member financial conflicts of interest and waivers. AAJ, formerly the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, believes conflicted persons should not be allowed to serve even as non-voting members, because "a non-voting member can still wield enough influence ... to upset the vote," the group writes. The Breast Cancer Action group, meanwhile, urges FDA to create guidelines requiring agency staff to contact a specific number of experts before a waiver can be deemed necessary. The March 2010 draft guidance is FDA's third attempt to carve out policies for financial conflicts of interest, following a draft guidance in 2002 and final guidance in 2008 (1"The Gray Sheet" April 26, 2010). The recent draft amends the prior versions to require public disclosure of the source of financial conflicts, which several commenters applauded

Related Content





Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts