Medtech Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Penumbra catheter recall

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

Firm is recalling older revisions of its Neuron 6F 070 delivery catheter after receiving reports that it could kink or ovalize in certain anatomy, leading to difficulty advancing the catheter or using it to deliver other devices. Consumers with the older Neuron 6F catheters should return them to receive a replacement, Penumbra says Sept. 29. In May, Penumbra recalled nine Neuron 5F Select catheters in a Class 1 action related to pinholes and exposed wire braids (1"The Gray Sheet" Sept. 14, 2009)

You may also be interested in...



Regulatory News In Brief

Electro-shock comments: FDA will accept public comments through Jan. 8 on electro-shock therapy devices in response to a "significant number of inquiries from members of the public and the health care community," the agency says. Electroconvulsive therapy systems are among the 27 device types available prior to the 1976 Medical Device Amendments, for which new versions can reach the market via 510(k) clearance, though they have not been formally risk-classified by FDA. The agency ordered makers of ECT devices and 24 other product types to submit safety and effectiveness information by Aug. 7 to inform FDA's decision on whether to down-classify the products to Class I or II, or require PMA applications (1"The Gray Sheet" Aug. 17, 2009). The new docket allows individuals other than manufacturers to submit information on the safety and efficacy of ECT devices. FDA did not specify the source of the inquiries leading to the comment opening, but there has been substantial debate among the psychiatric establishment, which generally supports 510(k) access for ECT devices, and skeptic groups, such as the Committee on Truth in Psychiatry, an organization of former shock therapy patients who push for more substantial regulation

Real World Data Failed To Impress Kaftrio’s European Reviewers

The European public assessment report for Kaftrio shows that EU regulators had concerns about whether Vertex’s triple drug combination for cystic fibrosis represented a new treatment paradigm.

Swissmedic Clears Up Confusion Over Validity Of GMP Certificates

Swissmedic says its good manufacturing practice certificates remain valid for longer than companies might assume. Separately, it is giving companies more time to conduct nitrosamine-related risk evaluations.

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

OM011382

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel