Institute Of Medicine Sets Top 100 Comparative Effectiveness Priorities
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Executive Summary
A June 30 Institute of Medicine 1report to Congress includes dozens of surgical- and device-related topics among a list of 100 recommended priorities for federally-funded comparative effectiveness research
You may also be interested in...
PCORI To Solicit More Head-To-Head Comparative Studies
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute announces plans to encourage the submission of more proposals for head-to-head clinical comparative effectiveness studies.
PCORI Research Priorities Too Broad For Meaningful Feedback, AdvaMed Says
The device industry, professional societies and other stakeholders weigh in on how the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute should shape its national priorities and research agenda.
PCORI Draft Research Agenda Offers Only Broad Areas Of Study
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute issues its draft national priorities and research agenda for comment Jan. 23. Rather than specific research items, the list contains five broad areas designed to elicit the greatest amount of input from stakeholders on what projects should be funded.