Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Medtronic pedicle screw appeal

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

Firm will pay substantially less in damages under a Federal Appeals Court decision that affirmed that Medtronic's now-defunct Vertex line of multi-axial pedicle screws infringed a Johnson & Johnson/DePuy Spine patent. The court cut $226 million in initial damages liability down to about $149 million, Medtronic announces June 1 (1"The Gray Sheet" Oct. 1, 2007, In Brief). The appeals court's review of the initial 2007 patent infringement verdict also eliminated another $10.5 million in sanctions and attorneys' fees. The infringing screws are no longer on the market, and the case has no bearing on Medtronic's current Vertex Select and OC systems, notes Medtronic Spine and Biologics President Steve La Neve

You may also be interested in...



Johnson & Johnson v. Medtronic

Medtronic's Vertex multi-axial pedicle screws infringe a Johnson & Johnson/DePuy patent, making Medtronic liable for $226.3 million in damages, a federal jury in Boston determines Sept. 27. In 2006, a federal appeals court sent the case back to the Massachusetts district court after finding that the lower court did not fully consider the "doctrine of equivalents" - which allows for an infringement finding if a technology performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way as a patent design, even if they are not equivalent - in its original non-infringement ruling. The Boston jury found Medtronic to have infringed under the doctrine. Medtronic will appeal and says that the decision might not be finalized for up to two years. In any case, it is phasing in a new "non-infringing" screw design for the Vertex line, which accounts for "under $100 million" in revenue, the company says

Turning That Frown Upside Down: Treating Depression With Facial Botox Injections

In this episode of the In Vivo podcast, Eric Finzi, CEO of Healis Therapeutics, discusses how his company is targeting major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental illnesses using facial botox injections.

California Bill To Age-Restrict Sales Of Diet Pills Further Along Than Other States’ Legislation

CA, MA and NJ legislatures remain in session with bills active proposing regulations similar to NY law effective 22 April requiring retailers, including online, to ask for proof of age when customers buying consumer health products containing ingredients labeled or promoted for weight loss and bodybuilding benefits appear younger than 18.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT027530

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel