Device Center Discord: 510(k) Review Process Is Flash Point At CDRH
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Executive SummaryDetails trickling into the public sphere about CDRH's device review process reveal heightened tension between reviewers and management over the proper response to a 510(k) submission
You may also be interested in...
In a 2-1 opinion, a federal appeals court ruled that FDA can’t use rescission to reverse a 510(k) clearance if the more time-consuming device reclassification process can accomplish the same ends. The decision sends a collagen knee scaffold device, which previously caused major contention inside FDA, back to the agency for a decision, but more court review might be ahead.
CDRH issues simplified SOPs for resolving differences of scientific, regulatory or clinical opinion among staffers. More regulatory news.
The latest medical device regulatory and reimbursement news from Elsevier Business Intelligence’s “The Gray Sheet.” This month we report on recent FDA proposals to streamline the 510(k) and PMA submission processes and the ongoing investigation into FDA surveillance of CDRH employee whistleblowers.