GAO Report On 510(k) Program Calls For Regulations On 20 Device Types
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
A long-awaited government report on the premarket review process for devices says FDA needs to decide "expeditiously" how to review 20 types of devices: through the stringent PMA approval process or through the less rigorous and faster 510(k) clearance process
You may also be interested in...
Companies are suspicious of FDA motivations in the drawn-out reclassification process for cranial electrotherapy stimulators. But the case also underscores how the agency's efforts to place devices in the appropriate risk category turns not only on the perceived safety of a device, but evidence supporting its benefits and the types of evidence the agency is comfortable accepting.
“The Gray Sheet” reviewed CDRH’s proposed orders and final classification decisions on preamendment devices targeted by the 515 initiative. As of Aug. 5, FDA has proposed or finalized 14 PMAs, and proposed or finalized 10 products to be downclassified to class II with special controls.
The Government Accountability Office is once again listing FDA's ability to ensure the safety and effectiveness of devices, drugs and other medical products on its roster of "high-risk" concerns.