Advisory panel conflicts
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Executive SummaryFDA could have done more to mitigate conflicts-of-interest among its advisory committee members by expanding outreach efforts to retired experts, academics and others, the Government Accountability Office concludes in a 1report released Oct. 9. FDA uses several methods to recruit panel members, but sometimes cannot find appropriate experts with no financial interests in the product or issue being discussed and must grant a waiver. Congress requested in 2005 that GAO investigate FDA's recruitment and waiver policies (2"The Gray Sheet" Sept. 26, 2005, p. 7). GAO reviewed 83 committee meetings convened by FDA's device, drug and biologics centers in 2004 and 2006, and interviewed consumer advocacy and trade groups, current and former FDA staff, and former panel members. About 16% of panel members received at least one conflict-of-interest determination, GAO found. In Aug. 28 comments, FDA questioned GAO's main criticism and highlighted four guidance documents on advisory panel policies, finalized Aug. 4, which are beyond the scope of the report (3"The Gray Sheet" Aug. 11, 2008, p. 3)
You may also be interested in...
The amyloid-targeting drug is years behind Biogen/Eisai’s aducanumab, but its subcutaneous administration and the GRADUATE studies’ design could give Roche’s gantenerumab an advantage.
Correvio's atrial fibrillation drug Brinavess will return to a US FDA advisory committee more than a decade after the agency first declined to approve the drug; FDA still has a series of cardiovascular safety concerns related to the drug and is not convinced by data from the European experience.