Medtech Insight is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Noncoverage for Anodyne Therapy?

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

CMS proposes national non-coverage for infrared therapy devices July 26, due to insufficient evidence that the treatment is reasonable and necessary for beneficiaries with peripheral neuropathy, skin ulcers and related conditions. The agency cites poor quality, small sample size and "a significant placebo effect" in the available clinical studies. "Only when basic efficacy has been established can investigators determine through additional studies which populations, if any, might benefit from experimental light therapy," the agency writes. CMS generated the national coverage decision internally, in part due to an FDA warning letter concerning burns from the Anodyne Therapy device (1"The Gray Sheet" Feb. 6, 2006, p. 5). Comments on the proposed decision are due Aug. 25...

You may also be interested in...



In Rare Move, CMS Cites FDA Warning Letter In National Coverage Request

CMS' internally-generated national coverage request for infrared therapy devices uncharacteristically refers to a recent FDA warning letter to manufacturer Anodyne Therapy

Pfizer Picks Up EU Pegfilgrastim Approval

Pfizer has now received a formal European Commission approval for its Nyvepria biosimilar pegfilgrastim. The approval puts the firm in direct competition with several other versions of the Neulasta original.

A Stroke Of Luck Boosts Oxford/AZ’s “Vaccine For The World”

AstraZeneca's research head admits that the half dose approach was a lucky mistake - but one that could boost the vaccine's effectiveness and supplies. The US regulator may not be persuaded, however.

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

SC143367

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel