FDA v. Utah Medical
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Independent members of the firm's board affirm "full and unanimous support" of Utah Medical's decision to pursue FDA dispute resolution through the federal court process "because of the fundamental refusal by FDA managers to communicate," according to an Aug. 16 company release. The Department of Justice filed a complaint Aug. 9 seeking to halt Utah Medical sales after an FDA inspection cited persistent QSR lapses dating to 2001, although the company maintains it is in compliance with QSR (1"The Gray Sheet" Aug. 16, 2004, p. 6). "We understand that the company's position is unusual, and may appear unwise to some shareholders, [but] I assure you that we haven't been provided another reasonable alternative," board member Stephen Bennett, MD, asserts. For example, a May 2004 request for non-binding mediation was rejected by the agency, according to the company. On Aug. 20, the firm instituted a 10% discount on all U.S. hospital orders as a "reward" for customer loyalty in the face of FDA's "unfair" charges...
You may also be interested in...
Utah Medical Products will challenge during pre-trial discovery whether FDA's inspectional observations of the Midvale, Utah facility can be construed as QSR violations
Liquid biopsy start-up Grail Inc. announced that a study of almost 6,700 participants found that its blood test could detect more than 50 types of cancer with a low false-positive rate. See what Minetta Liu, study co-lead author and a Mayo Clinic professor of oncology, had to say about the research.
Sanofi’s next-generation meningococcal vaccine, broader use of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Reblozyl move toward approval; United Therapeutics foreshadows Trevyent regulatory difficulties.