Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

ICD Guidelines From ACC/AHA/NASPE Embrace MADIT-II Prophylactic Use

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

ICDs should be implanted in heart attack victims whose left-ventricular ejection fraction is 30% or less one month after the event and three months post-revascularization, according to new practice guidelines issued jointly by ACC, AHA and NASPE

You may also be interested in...



Starts & Stops: Boston Scientific Starts, Stops, And Finishes TAVR Trials

Starts & Stops is a regular feature highlighting Medtech Insight editors' picks of noteworthy medtech clinical trial initiations, completions and suspensions each month. This month's edition includes seven trial-terminations – not as many as last month, but more than usual – for a variety of reasons, including Boston Scientific's suspension of all its trials of the Lotus transcatheter aortic valve due to a manufacturing problem.

Generalizability Of Prophylactic ICD Benefits Questioned By CMS, Panelists

CMS' reliance on the precise wording of Guidant's original national coverage determination request for expanded ICD use suggests the need for companies to tailor their requests to avoid overly broad interpretations

Generalizability Of Prophylactic ICD Benefits Questioned By CMS, Panelists

CMS' reliance on the precise wording of Guidant's original national coverage determination request for expanded ICD use suggests the need for companies to tailor their requests to avoid overly broad interpretations

Related Content

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT017221

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel