FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Executive SummarySupreme Court rules by a five-to-four margin March 21 that the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act does not authorize FDA to regulate tobacco products as medical devices. The FDCA allows FDA to regulate products that are unsafe for obtaining therapeutic benefit; but if tobacco products cannot be used safely for any therapeutic purpose, they fall outside of FDCA's regulatory scheme, the court concluded. Congressional action would be needed to grant FDA the explicit authority to regulate tobacco products. FDA's "nonsensical attempts" to regulate tobacco products as medical devices "was a colossal mistake from the beginning," Medical Device Manufacturers Association Executive Director Stephen Northrup comments in a same day release. It "would have set back the FDA's efforts to build a more reasonable regulatory structure for our industry's products at a time when the promise of medical technology has never been greater"
You may also be interested in...
New medicines under evaluation at the European Medicines Agency.
Discussions on the shape of health care have moved from “reimagining” to the next stage: building and executing on the vision. That is the thrust of EY’s NextWave Report: New Horizons 2019. Additionally, for medtechs seeking business continuum, “duality” is now a preoccupying thought.
The idea that public corporations have obligations that extend beyond the fiduciary responsibility to shareholders will be the dominant measure of responsible business behavior in the coming decade. Uncertainty about the extent of these commitments – commonly referenced as the environmental, social and governance (ESG) agenda – has produced equally variable responses from companies in the health care business.