FDA Seeks Comments On Proposed Rule For Releasing Cleared 510(k)s
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Executive Summary
Copyrighted material that has not been redacted by 510(k) applicants would be released on the Internet under FDA's proposed rule for redaction of cleared 510(k)s. Comments are due by March 20.
You may also be interested in...
FDA 510(k) Redaction Proposal For All 510(k)s Lacks Justification - Industry
FDA's proposal that all 510(k) sponsors must provide redacted versions of their submission upon clearance is unnecessary given the small number of Freedom of Information Act requests, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association asserts in March 20 comments to the agency.
FDA 510(k) Redaction Proposal For All 510(k)s Lacks Justification - Industry
FDA's proposal that all 510(k) sponsors must provide redacted versions of their submission upon clearance is unnecessary given the small number of Freedom of Information Act requests, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association asserts in March 20 comments to the agency.
FDA's Redacted 510(k) Proposed Rule Exceeds Statutory Authority - MDMA
FDA's proposed rule requiring 510(k) applicants to commit to providing redacted versions of 510(k)s within 30 days of FDA clearance exceeds the agency's statutory authority, according to comments submitted March 21 by the Medical Devices Manufacturers Association.