Medtech Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

PACIFIC BIOTECH RETRAINING MANUFACTURING PERSONNEL

This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet

Executive Summary

PACIFIC BIOTECH RETRAINING MANUFACTURING PERSONNEL as part of its response to a March 10 warning letter from FDA. Among several training deficiencies cited by the agency is "failure to follow written procedures" for the inspection of components of Cellulosenitrat Membrane and of HCG-Urine MS test kits. In its letter, FDA also points out that the firm failed to follow standard operating procedures (SOPs) for stability testing and expiration date testing for certain lots of Strep A O.S. products. The firm's response to this citation, which was communicated earlier in an FD-483 list of adverse observations, "is inadequate," FDA says. "The issue relates to following your SOPs, not to whether the reliability of the final results were affected." FDA inspected the in vitro diagnostic manufacturer's San Diego facility between Dec. 14 and Jan. 28. In addition, the warning letter notes a "failure to establish processing controls in the Multi-Step facility to assure that deviations from device specifications do not occur in that negative production controls were found by customers in HCG- Urine Test Kits." FDA says that Pacific Biotech provided neither a copy of its new procedure nor "documentation indicating training procedures and verification that training occurred" in its response to the 483. Pacific Biotech, a subsidiary of Eli Lilly, responded to FDA's letter on April 2. The firm says it also is revising its finished device testing and record-keeping procedures in order to correct other violations cited in the warning letter. FDA says that the firm has failed to "test finished devices for conformance with device specifications prior to release for distribution." Specifically, no such testing was performed on Cards O.S. Strep A tests, according to the agency. The letter also states that certain "Master Batch Records for Strep A O.S. Low Sensitivity controls" were unavailable during the FDA inspection and that "no protocol or test data for extending the expiration date of the Strep A O.S. Test Kits from nine to twelve months was available." The agency's inspection followed two December recalls of the Cards O.S. and Concise Strep A test kits, which were exhibiting false positive results. The firm says that both recalls are nearly complete. Pacific Biotech also conducted two recalls in August that involved several different types of tests including the Cards O.S. HCG-Urine and Strep A tests and the Concise HCG-Urine and Strep A immunochromatographic assays.

You may also be interested in...



Japan Grants Global-First Approval To Zolbetuximab, 15 Other New Drugs

Astellas's first-in class CLDN18.2-targeting antibody receives its first approval worldwide, while crovalimab and a number of drugs for rare diseases also receive nods from regulators and are now awaiting reimbursement price-listing.

Hanmi-OCI Merger Hits Wall As Brothers Win Shareholder Vote, Board Seats

The planned merger of Korea's Hanmi Pharm Group with OCI Group hits a major speed bump as the two sons of Hanmi's founder and other candidates recommended by them secture board seats. But it remains to be seen how the Lim brothers will fulfil their ambitious promises.

Beauty Firms Using AI-Based Tools Could Be Subject To Health Privacy Laws In US States

Using AI-based programs to collect and store consumer information risks running afoul of new health privacy laws cropping up in US states. Lack of federal regulation or guidance on the issue is one of the biggest challenges for beauty firms deploying AI, according to Stacy Marcus, partner at Reed Smith LLP.

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT000448

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel