To Consolidate or Network: For Laboratories, That's the Question
Executive Summary
Consolidation lowers operating expenses, a factor crucial in remaining competitive. But it cannot directly offset the losses that stem from the ongoing decline in the volume of inpatient testing as more health care services move to the ambulatory clinic arena. Networking, in contrast, allows laboratories to exploit the fixed cost aspects of their business by increasing volume, but it cannot bring down operating expenses enough to make members competitive with highly efficient independent reference la
You may also be interested in...
The State of Laboratory Unions
Hospital laboratory consolidation, underway for several years, is having mixed success as the market shifts. For suppliers, things are unlikely to settle down soon. Successful labs claim to be committed to a common vision and to swift action to institute painful changes. But other labs are stymied by politics, lack of top management support, and reluctance to make difficult decisions quickly. Manufacturers' expectations that consolidation would lead to standardization of equipment and a winner-take-all mentality are starting to come to pass. But the customer base continues to be in more flux than expected.
US FDA Drugs Center Ready To Break Down Silos On Regulatory Innovation
CDER Director Cavazzoni is promising to increase coordination and collaboration to accelerate broader adoption of innovative clinical trial designs and other approaches to speed drug development. A new "Quantitative Medicine Center of Excellence" illustrates the approach.
New OSP Director To Guide CDER-Wide IT Upgrades; System Enhancements Speed ANDA Assessments
Generic Drug Structured Assessment for Bioequivalence launched in 2023 and has been used in 40 ANDA reviews so far.